You know it’s a day that ends in “y” when there’s a new App Store lawsuit.This time, the issue isn’t antitrust or developer rejection complaints, but rather a class action accusing Apple of facilitating the spread of cryptocurrency scams by allowing a fake trading app onto the App Store.Here’s what happened.
Filed this week in the Northern District of California (via ), the lawsuit centers around an app called Swiftcrypt, which allegedly posed as a legitimate crypto trading platform but was really part of a broader “pig butchering” scam.That is when users are coaxed into depositing larger and larger amounts of money, slowly building trust, before the platform locks them out and disappears with the funds.“Customer trust is a cornerstone of the App ecosystem.” Lead plaintiff Danyell Shin says she downloaded Swiftcrypt onto her iPhone in late 2024, after being introduced to the app through an online investment group.
Believing the app was trustworthy, partly because it came from Apple’s App Store, she ended up transferring more than $80,000 into the platform.Then, the funds vanished.According to court documents, Apple’s own marketing and App Store messaging played a key role in making users feel safe enough to trust the app in the first place.
The complaint cites Apple’s frequent claims that the App Store is a “safe and trusted place” and highlights years of statements about strict App Review processes, fraud detection, and curated app security: Apple’s App Review process called out, again The filing paints a detailed picture of how Apple’s own rules for crypto apps, requiring licensing, regulatory compliance, and developer verification, were supposedly not enforced in this case.Swiftcrypt, the lawsuit says, never should have made it onto the App Store at all.Beyond the lost crypto funds, the class action claims that Apple’s entire App Store security narrative is misleading under California consumer protection law.
The suit argues that users like Shin “overpaid” for their iPhones because part of the perceived value was tied to App Store safety and security guarantees that didn’t hold up.In addition to financial damages, the plaintiffs want Apple to launch a corrective advertising campaign to fix what they say is a widespread public misperception about App Store safety. You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day.
Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop.Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel
