Linux is famous for being customizable, flexible, and resource-friendly.Unfortunately, despite gains in recent years, there are some areas where it still can't beat Windows.Linux lags with biometric options Biometric login methods like facial recognition and fingerprint scanning have become increasingly popular as phones have brought the technologies into the mainstream.
Now, biometric login options like those have made their way into mid-range and high-end laptops of all kinds, though they're still pretty rare on desktop PCs.Windows puts its biometric options front-and-center during the installation process.You'll always receive at least one message during setup about using Windows Hello, and sometimes major feature updates will also trigger a reminder if you're not already using it.
By default, you can use Windows Hello fingerprints or facial recognition to: Log in to your PC Log into some apps and websites that support it Confirm changes to your system And more.Even though some control over biometrics requires Windows Pro, biometrics feel like a normal feature of the operating system.On the other hand, biometrics on every Linux distros usually feels like a bit of an afterthought, or a feature that was attached just to be able to say "Yes, Linux has biometric logins." In the times I've tried it, it was difficult to get facial recognition to work on my Surface Laptop 4, and even then it seemed of very limited use.
Fingerprint scanning is a bit better and relies on something called fprintd, which is a third-party project that aims to make fingerprint scanning on Linux compatible with as many different physical fingerprint scanners as possible.It is an ambitious project and I can't fault the developers, but it doesn't have the same convenience factor that Windows Hello does.Windows is great with windows It's in the name: Windows.
Linux as more desktop environments than I can begin to count, but none of them rival how well WIndows handles windows.Even macOS lags behind.Consider Snap Layouts alone.
By hovering over the maximize button, you can instantly snap your windows into one of a half-dozen different configurations.Windows isn't alone in offering the feature.KDE's take on it is certainly very solid, but Windows' implementation is easier to use and doesn't usually require manual intervention to get it working like you want it.
Windows also behaves more reliably when you're using a multi-monitor setup.You can shut off a screen, or even physically disconnect it, and your windows will move right back to where they were.If you include Microsoft programs that aren't shipped with Windows by default, then FancyZones and WorkSpaces guarantee that Windows leaves the competition in the dust.
They take everything great about Windows 11's snap layouts and window management and dial it up to 11.Software support is everything Windows has been providing support for consumer applications for decades at this point, and it shows with the software ecosystem that is built around it.This is painfully obvious in two areas: gaming and arts programs.
Gaming still suffers Gaming on Linux has come a long way, especially since Steam's Proton now enables you to play most games on Linux reasonably well.However, anti-cheat is still a large problem.Anti-cheat software like EAC is designed to ensure that multiplayer games are fair by running in the background of a PC to keep an eye out for anyone using any kind of exploits.
On Windows, these software solutions normally run a kernel-level, which makes it difficult to hide something like an aimbot.3 reasons most people stick with Windows, even though Linux is free Microsoft built a fortress around its user base.From schools to enterprises, Windows is so deeply woven into daily life that change seem unthinkable.
Posts 88 By Graeme Peacock Linux anti-cheat software doesn't run at the kernel level, which theoretically limits the ability of anti-cheat to detect exploits.While the effectiveness of kernel-level anti-cheat compared to more privacy-friendly options is debatable, the practical consequences are not: It is difficult or impossible to play many competitive games on Linux.Linux is behind in the arts Windows and macOS have dominated the artistic world for decades, and it shows when you compare the number of programs available for Linux and the number of programs available for Windows.
A large specialized software ecosystem isn't a "feature" precisely, but it is massively important when you're trying to pick an operating system to use daily.If you need regular access to the AutoDesk programs (like Maya) or the Adobe Suite, Windows is the decisive winner.You can make them run on Linux, but it requires a specialized setup, time, and the workarounds are prone to breaking when the software receives an update.
Windows has received a lot of criticism for some recent changes, but it does have one thing going for it: Using it is very convenient.Logitech Brio If you're looking to be on the bleeding edge of webcam technology, the Logitech Brio is one of the few 4K webcams on the market.It's a purchase that helps future-proof your setup for years to come.
See at amazon Expand Collapse
Read More
