I haven't used a phone case in yearshere's why Samsung forced me to change my ways

Maybe it's because I come from the pre-smartphone era, but I hate phone cases.Smartphones are beautiful devices (at least the ones I buy are) that feel great in the hand and are lovely to look at, so why slap an ugly case on it? So it will sell for more when I'm done? So someone else can get the enjoyment I denied myself? Opinions on the merits of cases aside, the fact is that most of my smartphone history has been case-less.I had a dalliance with leather cases just in time for them to fall completely out of favor, but apart from that, my first instinct was to avoid them.I recently got a good deal on a Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra as my carrier got rid of this outgoing model, and I did not want to put a case on it.

However, thanks to a boneheaded decision by Samsung, that's exactly what I ended up doing.Switching to Samsung broke my “caseless + MagSafe” setup Bye-bye clean setup I guess I also have to put some of the blame on Apple here, too.I took a break from Android for about four years, during which I became used to the convenience of MagSafe.

I use a MagSafe charging stand on my desk, which turns my phone into a desk clock plus whatever other useful widgets I can squeeze onto the always-on display.There's also a wealth of cool accessories, such as wallet attachments and power bank backpacks, that I've used on occasion and would like to keep using if at all possible.The problem is that Samsung chose not to put any actual alignment magnets in the phone! So sure if I hold my S25 Ultra to the charging pad, it will charge, but if you let go, it just falls down.

It's too bad, because to me, having a magnetic attachment point on my phone with no case is the perfect minimalist solution.What's most ironic to me is that, in an interview with the Verge, the Samsung R&D chief explained that part of the rationale for leaving magnets out of the latest S26 Ultra was that most people use cases, in which case the internal magnets do nothing.But, in my situation, I wouldn't be using a case if there were magnets in my phone! Thanks, Samsung.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra SoC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Display 6.9-inch Dynamic Super AMOLED 2X RAM 12 or 16 GB Storage 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB Battery 5,000 mAh Operating System Android Get the new Galaxy S26 Ultra with AI smarts and an all-new privacy display.It's big, powerful, packed with AI, and you'll love the S-Pen stylus.  Front camera 12MP f/2.2 Rear camera 200MP f/1.4 main, 50MP f/1.9 ultrawide, 10MP f/2.4 telephoto, 50MP f/2.9 telephoto Dimensions 163.6 x 78.1 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.31 in) Colors Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold Weight 214g Charge speed 60W wired Super Fast Charging, 25W wireless Stylus S-Pen $1300 at Samsung $1300 at Amazon Expand Collapse The awkward reality of magnetic accessories on Android It's a mess I had a look around online to see which Android phones do have built-in magnets, and for now it seems the answer is "none." The Qi2 standard does make provision for magnetic charging, and it's not like there's some sort of patent conflict with Apple's MagSafe, so I have to assume that other phone manufacturers are also making the decision based on the same logic.I also don't know what sorts of costs or trade-offs there are to putting this feature in a phone.

Who knows? Maybe Apple had to make some major sacrifices with its iPhones to get magnets in them.What would actually be lost in an S26 Ultra in exchange for built-in magnets? In that aforementioned Verge interview, one answer is that magnets would mean added thickness.If that's the case, just how thin would the iPhone Air have been without MagSafe? Maybe Apple had no choice but to put in those thickening magnets or the Air would have to be reclassified as a knife, which would mean you couldn't take it on a plane.

dbrand Ghost 2.0 for Galaxy S25 Ultra The dbrand Ghost 2.0 is an ultra-thin, precision-engineered case that shows off the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s design while offering rigid, yellowing-resistant protection.Minimalist, matte, and nearly invisible—this is protection without compromise.$60 at dbrand Expand Collapse Again, if my phone had magnets in it, I would not need the case, and then the bit of extra thickness would be irrelevant, but apparently, the number of case-less users is such a minority that I wonder why they don't just rubberize the phone in the factory and save everyone some time.

Now, before you say it, I am fully aware that I could also just buy a magnet ring sticker for my phone instead of a whole case, and honestly, I might end up doing that, but right now I don't want to for a few good reasons.Subscribe to the newsletter for MagSafe, cases, and trends Get clearer perspective by subscribing to our newsletter: in-depth coverage and analysis of smartphone accessory developments, magnetic-charging standards, case trade-offs, and design choices to deepen your understanding of minimalist setups and attachmen Get Updates By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.You can unsubscribe anytime.

First, I hate the idea of stickers.I have never stuck one on my car, my laptop, my phones, or my tablets.If you like attaching stuff with adhesive to your devices, then more power to you, but all my Apple stickers are still in the boxes they came in, so that tells you how I feel.

Second, I need my phone to have a flat back.This might be a total personal peeve, but if I had a bump or raised surfaces I could feel on the back of my phone, it would be like a tooth cavity you can't leave alone.It would drive me nuts! Third, I just don't trust the adhesive to keep my phone safely secured.

Call me paranoid, but I don't want my expensive phone held up by a thin circle of glue.I guess I'll have to check in again a few years from now to see if Android phone makers have changed their minds.

Read More
Related Posts